< FEBRUARY 2020 UPDATE newsletter

The indoctrination of our children through fake history

Many of us have grave reservations about the content the new, soon-to-be-compulsory history curriculum. As political commentator Chris Trotter writes in Taking Control Of The Nation’s Story:

 “If Maori nationalist historians can seize control of the new, soon-to-be-compulsory, history curriculum, then the necessary ideological preparations can be made for a radical constitutional transformation”.

We have a right to expect a fair view of our history that it will be taught in a factual and unbiased manner. However, our hopes are already being dashed - the indoctrination of children through fake history is already being realised.

 Ti Tiriti o Waitangi – a comic book, by Ross Calman, Mark Derby and Toby Morris – a book full of a great many errors of fact and interpretation - being a case in point.  This is being touted as a graphic novel providing a fresh approach to the story of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It is already available in many primary and intermediate schools in New Zealand.

You can read it at the Spin Off blog, please click HERE.

The Ministry of Education has an audio version, available HERE.

Our children are entitled to an education that is free from political manipulation. This principle is absent from this publication. It is biased and inaccurate - bound to misinform and mislead. It should not be available in our school system.

If you agree with the condemnation of this book, (please see our reasons below), we encourage you to take action.  Send a letter to your MP, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Education, requesting they immediately remove this comic book from our schools.

Email addresses:

The Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern: [email protected]

Minister of Education, Chris Hipkins: [email protected]

Follow this up by voicing your concerns to National’s Simon Bridges, ACT’s David Seymour and NZ First’s Winston Peters.

Please encourage your friends, family and colleagues to also do so. A couple of letters can easily be dismissed, but 100, 200 or more - not so much. 

Below are listed some of the passages of concern, with accompanying explanations. (Excerpts from the book are in italics). Scroll down to view a copy of the book.

The text talks up the Declaration of Independence, signed by a small number of chiefs in 1835 but fails to point out this was a failure, as it never succeeded in its goal of setting up a pan-tribal Maori government. No meeting of the confederate chiefs ever took place after 1835.

Even more serious is the assertion in Part 2 that “important words and concepts such as sovereignty were not properly explained in te reo Maori. Many people now think that was done on purpose.”  And: For Maori, the spoken promises made by British officials were more important than the written text. Their explanations about how Te Tiriti would affect the chiefs and their people were often misleading”.  There is no evidence that there was a deliberate intention to mislead the Maori chiefs. On the contrary, it is clear from the records which William Colenso made at the time that the chiefs understood very well what sovereignty meant - that they were being asked to subordinate their authority to Queen Victoria. We know this because many of the speeches made by chiefs objected to being subordinate in that way - but nevertheless they did sign. Twenty years later, in 1860, at a conference of many chiefs at Kohimarama, speech after speech by chiefs reaffirmed their commitment to the authority of the Queen.

The book claims that the Maori version of Article II of the Treaty promised that “Chiefs would still rule their people independently, while the Pakeha governor would control the Pakeha”.  This is profoundly dishonest! Article II says nothing of the kind - it states:

“The Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the chiefs & tribes and to all the people of New Zealand the possession of their lands, dwellings and all their property. But the chiefs of the Confederation and the other chiefs grant to the chiefs Queen, the exclusive right of purchasing such land as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to sell at such prices as shall be agreed upon between them and the persons appointed by the Queen to purchase from them”.

Furthermore, the book’s grossly misleading interpretation of Article II is demonstrably inconsistent with the preamble of the Treaty, about which the book is silent, no doubt because the preamble doesn’t suit the pejorative narrative the book is  peddling.

In Part 3, it is asserted that before 1840, almost all the land and natural resources belonged to Maori”. This is quite a misleading statement. Before 1840, much land in Northland had already been sold to Pakeha, as had very large tracts of land in the South Island. This is illustrated by the fact that at the signing of the Treaty Chief Rewa complained that all of his land had gone. Furthermore, there is no mention that after the signing of the Treaty, the Crown set up a land commission to investigate land transactions which pre-dated the Treaty, and any Governor Hobson considered to be unfair were taken from the purchaser and returned to Maori, without compensation for the buyers. But instead of pointing this out, the authors prefer to highlight that: After Te Tiriti was signed, the governor and his officials encouraged Maori to sell the land”.

The text states that As punishment for rebelling again the government, the British took millions of hectares of land from iwi”.  This gross exaggeration casts doubt on the integrity of the authors.  Approximately 1.3 million hectares were confiscated “as punishment for rebelling against the government”, which Maori tribes should not have been surprised about because they were amply warned this would be a consequence. In the event, more than half the area confiscated, or some 700,000 hectares, was returned to Maori, leaving a net amount confiscated of 600,000 hectares - a large area, but certainly not “millions of hectares”. That 600,000 hectares was not much more than 2% of New Zealand’s land area. But that’s not the impression given by the book’s grossly inflated claim.

The pejorative nature of the book is again illustrated in the statementThe court changed the way Maori land was owned, making it easier for Pakeha settlers to buy”. This is a very subjective view – the author could just as easily have said, “making it easier for Maori to sell”.

The book states thatMaori children were often punished for speaking their language.That is true, but there is no reference to the fact that Maori themselves petitioned the government to ban te reo in schools because they realised that learning English was the pathway to the modern world.

Please note that the comic book is informed by the material originally published in the following two school journals:

  • “Te Tiriti o Waitangi” by Ross Calman (School Journal Level 3 2017); and
  • “Keeping Promises: The Treaty Settlement Process” by Mark Derby (School Journal level 4 2017).

These two publications must also be reviewed, and removed from schools if they also contain misinformation of a similar nature.

Recommended reading:

  • The Treaty and it Times - by Paul Moon and Peter Biggs
  • A Compendium of Official Documents relative to Native Affairs in the South Island, Volume One - Victoria University 
  • The Treaty of Waitangi: How New Zealand Became a British Colony - by T. Lindsay Buick
  • The Kingite Rebellion, by John Robinson

For commentaries on why our history is being politicized, see the following articles:

Fake History by Dr Muriel Newman; and

Taking Control Of The Nation’s Story by Chris Trotter



Go back to the FEBRUARY 2020 UPDATE newsletter


The Treaty of Waitangi – a force for unity or division?

The anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi on 6 February is an appropriate time to reflect on the Treaty, and what it means for New Zealand today. Continue reading

Recommended reading - ONE SUN IN THE SKY

‘ONE SUN IN THE SKY - The untold story of sovereignty and the Treaty of Waitangi’ by Ewen McQueen, presents an evidence-based perspective on the question of sovereignty and the Treaty of Waitangi.  Continue reading

Treaty settlements over the Waitemata and Manukau Harbours, and the Hauraki Gulf

There is a very real danger co-governance arrangements like the Tūpuna Maunga Authority are being considered for the Waitemata and Manukau Harbours, and the Hauraki Gulf. Continue reading

Urgent: Coastal claims update - can you help?

Countering the Coastal Claims Campaign is seeking to contact people who know the history of the stretch of coastline in the southern Hawke’s Bay from Whangaehu to Cape Turnagain, which is being claimed under the Marine and Coastal Area Act, (claim no. CIV-2011-485-789). If you, or anyone you know is familiar with the coastline, please email [email protected]. This is an urgent request, as statements of evidence from interested parties must be filed and served on Ms Clarkson, (on behalf of the applicants), the Attorney General, and the overlapping claimants by 16 January 2019. Continue reading

North Head now controlled by Tupuna Maunga Authority

As part of a Treaty of Waitangi settlement, 14 volcanic cones were given to 13 iwi and hapū of Auckland when the Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau Collective Redress Deed passed into law in 2014. North Head (Maungauika) is the last of these to come under the control of the Tupuna Maunga Authority (TMA) - when it was transferred from the Department of Conservation on January 18.  Continue reading

Supreme Court decision gives weight to the ‘principles’ of the Treaty

An Auckland iwi, Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust, has won a Supreme Court case giving it the right to re-apply for exclusive rights to conduct commercial operations on Rangitoto and Motutapu Islands, (situated in the Hauraki Gulf). The main issue was the interpretation of section four of the Conservation Act, "to give effect to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi". Continue reading

Implementation of Treaty settlements creating significant cost pressures

The Waikato Regional Council’s draft submission to the Productivity Commission’s inquiry into Local Government Funding and Financing reveals that the implementation of Treaty of Waitangi settlements creates significant cost pressures for Council. The submission states that “the Council wishes to work with its iwi partners in partnership but notes that the costs to do so is significant to its ratepayers”. Continue reading

Bruce Moon talks on the Treaty

Bruce Moon, a retired physicist and avid historian, was invited by the Nelson Institute to give a talk at Nelson’s Elma Turner Library, on 8th April. He chose to speak on New Zealand's "fake history" related to Treaty of Waitangi issues, billed as “Twisting the Treaty and other fake history”. Continue reading

Lies, lies And More Lies - Challenging The Propaganda

“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell, 1984 The media and iwi appear to be on a crusade to ‘appropriate’ the truth. For instance, over the past couple of weeks both Radio NZ and the East & Bays Courier have featured items whereby there have been claims made that Ngati Whatua Ōrākei gifted the land for the establishment of Auckland. Continue reading

The widespread re-writing of our history – lies, lies and more lies!

In an article published on Breaking Views on November 14th Bruce Moon, a retired computer pioneer and author of ‘Real Treaty; False Treaty - The True Waitangi Story’, laments the insidious effort to erase our true history, accounts of which appear in the news media almost every day. Continue reading

Waikato Tainui Pushing For The Next Stage Of Treaty Settlements

In May 1995 the Crown signed a Deed of Settlement with Waikato-Tainui that included cash and land valued at $170 million (since topped up with an additional $260 million, with more to come). The public was told at the time the settlement was "full and final". However, full and final it does not appear to be as the iwi moves beyond negotiating for economic benefits to pushing for statutory power through co-governance arrangements, seats at the council table, and the RMA. Continue reading

The Waitangi Tribunal – a corrupt system?

Dr John Robinson, in an open letter sent to the Minister of Treaty Negotiations on November 25th, is highly critical of the Waitangi Tribunal, and is calling for a new approach. Dr Robinson has based his proposal on his personal experiences and observations. Continue reading

Start From Scratch: The New Zealand Histories Curriculum

Sean Plunket recently asked one of our top historians, Dr Paul Moon, Professor of History at Auckland University of Technology, for his view on the new history curriculum to be taught in New Zealand schools. His answer? Start from scratch. Continue reading

More on our highly unsatisfactory new NZ history curriculum

Haka performed in front of the Ōhinemutu pā, which withstood the assault by Te Waharoa in 1836. PUBL-0014-53, Angas, George French, 1822–1886: War dance before the Pah of Oinemutu, near Rotorua Lake. J.W. Giles lith., 1847. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington. Following the comments we made last month about the inexplicable decision by the Ministry of Education not to release for public viewing submissions made on the proposed new history curriculum, look at what noted  historian Dr Paul Moon says about how the exercise was handled.  Continue reading

No real changes to the radical draft New Zealand ‘histories’ curriculum

A recently released report on the draft curriculum content for teaching New Zealand’s ‘histories’ in our schools points to a determination to continue down the path of foisting upon our children an ideologically driven lop-sided version of our history. This is despite much criticism about the lack of balance in the draft content from historians, educationalists, parents/family, and community members. Continue reading

Another Media Council Fail

Recently a member sent a letter of complaint to Stuff regarding a comment made by Labour MP Arena Williams as guest columnist in newspapers published throughout New Zealand during February. The Williams commentary trotted out the oft-repeated lie about the Rangiaowhia affray - saying that “Colonel Nixon… was famous for razing unfortified Rangiaowhia while men, women and children burnt in their church.” The member writes:  “That would certainly be a callous act if it were true. But it is not.  Continue reading

New history curriculum - thumbs down from some

The Government has recently released their draft New Zealand history curriculum, which has been circulated for public feedback. The main themes include the arrival of Māori, early colonial history, the Treaty of Waitangi, the New Zealand wars, and New Zealand's role in the Pacific. Continue reading

Event to commemorate Governor Hobson

Auckland City Early Heritage Group seeks to revive the tradition of showing respect to the founder of Auckland and father of modern New Zealand, Governor William Hobson. This month marks 177 years since he died of stroke complications in the city he created. Today his remains are buried in Grafton Cemetery. Continue reading

Recommended reading

Navigators and Naturalists – French exploration of New Zealand and the South Seas (1769 - 1824), by Michael Lee. Married and Gone to New Zealand, edited by Alison Drummond. Anyone interested in the truth about NZ history should read these books. Continue reading