< February 2025 newsletter


Oral submission on the Principles of the Treaty Bill

Presented to the Justice Select Committee by the Chair of Democracy Action, Lee Short on 17 February 2025

“Morena, and Good Morning, Chair and members of the Justice Committee

My name is Lee Short. I am the Chair of Democracy Action.

Thank you for giving me this opportunity to present our case to you this morning

Firstly, I would like to begin by thanking the ACT party for having the integrity to give the people of New Zealand the opportunity to have a say on the principles of the Treaty. The general public has never been given such an opportunity before now, despite the significant impact the principles - as defined by the Waitangi Tribunal and the courts - are having on our constitution, and our rights - including the undermining of the fundamental principles of democracy, and equality of citizenship.

This country belongs to all its citizens, and we, all of us, should all be given the opportunity to determine the direction of our own nation.

Democracy Action supports the Bill, though with reservations specific to Principle 2. I will explain why this is so in a moment.

When Tiriti o Waitangi was signed in 1840, a cloak of governance was spread across the country, unifying it under one government for the first time. As shown by the recorded statements of Rangatira at Waitangi and evidenced in the archives of the British and New Zealand Governments, the more than 500 chiefs who signed were willing to accept the British system of law and government.

This was confirmed and endorsed by the chiefs who gathered at Kohimarama for a month in 1860. 

All 112 chiefs present at the conference unanimously pledged to do nothing inconsistent with their declared recognition of the Queen's sovereignty, and of the union of the two races.

This commitment was reiterated a century later by Sir Āpirana Ngata, who stated that Māori ceded sovereignty by signing Te Tiriti. During a speech commemorating the Treaty’s centenary, Sir Āpirana emphasized the importance of this understanding, stating:

“Clause 1 of the Treaty handed over the mana and the sovereignty of New Zealand to Queen Victoria and her descendants forever. That is the outstanding fact today.”

With the signing of the Treaty, we became united under one government, and over the decades, our country has transformed into an independent sovereign nation with a democratic system, where the authority to govern is derived from the people. For all intents and purposes, the term 'the Crown' now represents the collective voice of the people of New Zealand, making all citizens a part of the sovereign entity.

We at Democracy Action support Principle 1: “The Government of New Zealand has full power to govern, and Parliament has full power to make laws.

Our existing government system is under serious threat. There are moves afoot to transform the constitution of New Zealand, aiming to establish a system of two separate race-based governments, operating under entirely different systems, to jointly govern the nation.

The concept of dual sovereignty has been promoted by the Waitangi Tribunal, the Iwi Chairs Forum in their Matike Mai report, and in the He Puapua report commissioned by the Labour Government in 2019.

This approach is further reflected in the policy of co-governance, which signals a departure from equality and democracy.

The claim by some that such a transformed constitution will benefit all New Zealanders, THAT IT IS GOOD FOR US, is a downright lie.  It is not to the benefit of other New Zealanders to lose our democracy and equality to a specific group in a nation divided by race.

As warned by former Labour Prime Minister David Lange in 2000: “We can have a democratic form of government, or we can have indigenous sovereignty. They cant coexist and we cant have them both.”

Our history is being rewritten. Various modern interpretations of the Treaty of Waitangi have fundamentally altered its original intent – that of unity and equality - transforming it into a tool of division instead.

We, as a people living together in New Zealand today, must stand against the notion of being governed from beyond the grave, to be required to follow a dated and disputed text. It is essential that we assert our right to self-determination - that we – ALL of us - have the freedom to decide for ourselves, for our time.

The idea of well-defined guiding principles points in the right direction. 

Therefore, we submit that Principle 1 advance to a nationwide referendum.

Democracy Action also supports Principle 3: “The Right to Equality”.

Principle 3 reflects Article 3 of the Treaty, whereby all the people of New Zealand gained the rights and privileges of British citizenship.  This is a clear statement of equality.

The concept of equality has long been accepted as key to a peaceful human society. This universal accord is made clear in Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that:

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”

Furthermore, comprehensive condemnation of inequality based on race is found in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in a statement by the General Assembly.

I quote:

“Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust”.

This is further emphasised in the last paragraph, which makes it clear that any claim to indigenous status is secondary to the fundamental principles of equality and democracy:

Quote:

“The provisions set forth in this declaration shall be interpreted in accordance with the principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, equality, non-discrimination, good governance and good faith.”

The idea of equality within a democratic system has faced significant challenges over the past 50 years. Equality has gradually eroded. It has been compromised by both major political parties as they endorse policies that discriminate based on race. For instance, the National Party did so by repealing the Foreshore and Seabed Act and implementing the Marine and Coastal Area Act, while the Labour Party has demonstrated a strong commitment to separate race-based policies.

But, there is nothing more precious to a people, and a nation, than the common belief of all that we are equal, that we each and every one belong here, that this land is our land – along with all the commons, the lakes, rivers and beaches, the bush, the mountains and the sea.

Therefore, we submit that Principle 3 advance to a nationwide referendum.

Now, I will address Principle 2, “Rights of hapū and iwi Māori—the Crown recognises the rights that hapū and iwi had when they signed the Treaty/te Tiriti. The Crown will respect and protect those rights. Those rights differ from the rights everyone has a reasonable expectation to enjoy only when they are specified in Treaty settlements”.

This principle raises significant concerns as outlined in our written submission.

Initially, when the Treaty settlement process began, most New Zealanders found the settlements largely acceptable. However, since 2010, there has been an increasing trend to incorporate co-governance and similar arrangements into these settlements, usually concerning public resources, such as parks, mountains, rivers, lakes, and the coastline, without consulting, let alone seeking the consent of the people. This move towards institutionalizing a 50:50 co-governance model based on race poses a significant threat to our democracy by eroding the democratic rights of other New Zealanders. It disregards the critical principle of proportionality and contravenes section 19(1) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, which guarantees freedom from racial discrimination.

Moreover, with many settlements still pending, there is a risk that the provisions in Principle 2 could be used to circumvent the obligations specified in Principles 1 and 3.

Therefore, Democracy Action does not support Principle 2 of the Bill, but does support the Act party’s original principle 2 as outlined in the coalition agreement and arguably the one Act was elected to advance, and which reflects article 2 of Tiriti o Waitangi, and that is:

The New Zealand Government will protect all New Zealanders’ authority over their land and other property.

In conclusion, we support three basic principles, that are:

  •  The New Zealand government has the right to govern New Zealand.
  • The New Zealand government will protect all New Zealanders’ authority over their land and other property,

and

  • All New Zealanders are equal under the law, with the same rights and duties.

We submit that these three principles advance to a nationwide referendum.

Thank you.

Go back to the February 2025 newsletter


RELATED ARTICLES


Submission: The Treaty Principles Bill

Democracy Action supports the Bill, though with reservations specifically concerning Principle 2. We support the objective to “create greater certainty and clarity to the meaning of the principles in legislation”. Parliament has failed the nation by incorporating the concept of principles of the Treaty in legislation without providing a clear definition. As a result, unelected bodies like the Waitangi Tribunal and the courts, which lack democratic oversight and accountability, have taken on the task of interpreting these principles. Their interpretations of the "principles of the Treaty" are reshaping New Zealand's constitutional framework, and in doing so undermining the tenets of democracy and equal citizenship. This transformation of the country's constitutional structure has occurred without the consent of the people. Therefore, we welcome this opportunity to participate in a national dialogue regarding the role of the principles of the Treaty within our constitutional framework - a conversation which we consider to be well overdue. Continue reading

Submission: Marine and Coastal Area Act Amendment Bill

Here's our written submission on the government's proposed Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) (Customary Marine Title) Amendment Bill. Continue reading

Submission: Local Government (Electoral Legislation and Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Bill

  Written submission Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the Local Government (Electoral Legislation and Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Bill. Democracy Action supports the policy of enabling local electors to take part in their local elections and decisions about their local electoral arrangements. Continue reading

Democracy Action oral submission to Auckland Council re: designated Māori seats

Oral submission to the Auckland Council Governing Body on 2 October 2023 Good morning your worship Mayor Brown and Councillors. Thank you for this opportunity to share our views on the council’s proposal to introduce designated Māori seats. I am here representing Democracy Action – a group of citizens advocating for the protection of democracy and equality of citizenship. Continue reading

Submission on the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill

We have put together a simple submission on the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill, which you are welcome to use as a template for your own. Remember the final day for submissions is Wednesday 1 November. Continue reading

Submission on the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill

Below is our submission on the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill. Continue reading

Submission on the Natural and Built Environment Bill

Below is a copy of our written and oral submissions on the Natural and Built Environment Bill and Spatial Planning Bill. Continue reading

Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill Submission

We at Democracy Action have significant concerns about the independence of public media under the proposed legislation. We believe the bill does not adequately safeguard editorial freedom. Continue reading

Our key concerns with the Water Services Entities Bill

The impact of the Water Services Entities Bill will be profound. The public and many local authorities appear to share many common concerns about provisions set out in the Bill. These include: Continue reading

Submission on the Canterbury Regional Council (Ngāi Tahu Representation) Bill

  WRITTEN SUBMISSION Democracy Action does not support the Bill.  We do not support establishing iwi-based power by appointment in our governance arrangements. Therefore, we oppose the purpose of the Act, that is, to enable Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu to appoint up to 2 members to the Canterbury Regional Council.  We urge the Government to reject the Bill in its entirety.  Continue reading

Submissions on the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Bill

Oral submission text: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Bill. I am presenting this submission on behalf of Democracy Action.  Firstly, I want to make it clear we wholeheartedly support the purpose of the Act - that is to protect, promote, and improve the health and future health of all New Zealanders. But, if the intention is to improve the health of ALL New Zealanders, this proposed legislation is absolutely the wrong way to go about it.  Continue reading