< September 2022 newsletter


Fears raised about government control of new public media entity

Independent media, free of government influence, is vital to a well-functioning democracy. The media must be able to hold government officials accountable, raise controversial issues without fear of reprisal, and include a diversity of voices and opinions, not just those that politicians want covered. However, the legislation to merge RNZ and TVNZ - the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill - is raising fears that our new public media entity - ‘Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media’ will result in opportunities for political interference.

Former New Zealand Herald editor-in-chief Dr Gavin Ellis, outlining his concerns about the creation of the new public media entity at a virtual meeting run by the Better Public Media Trust on 24 May 2022 said:

“This entity will also be monitored by more state agencies than ever before. This is at a time when trust in media and trust in government is at an all-time low. If we don't do something to ensure the absolute independence of this entity ... then it will not gain the trust of the public."

Yet, a strongly independent media is not a policy the government has chosen to pursue. Clause 15 of the bill purports to restrict the Minister’s ability to direct the entity in relation to editorial matters, claiming these restrictions are largely the same as those relating to TVNZ and RNZ. However, under the law change the new entity will become an ‘Autonomous Crown Entity’, and the Crown Entities Act says an ACE ‘must have regard to government policy when directed by their responsible minister.’ This classification is quite different from the current situation, whereby TVNZ and RNZ are Crown Entity Companies - making them legally independent from the Crown and unable to be directed by government ministers.

When the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill was tabled in June, National Party broadcasting spokesperson Melissa Lee expressed concern that the Autonomous Crown Entity (ACE) would be vulnerable to ministerial influence, saying:

 I'm worried that it will create not only the perception, but also the reality that the new entity will become a mouthpiece for the Government.”

At the time, Broadcasting and Media Minister Willie Jackson told RNZ’s Mediawatch the government could not be completely hands-off with something funded with hundreds of millions of dollars - but he said no-one should worry about interference.

“Do you really think that the government will be managing interviews or trying to change stuff? We're already covered in the Broadcasting Act in terms of editorial independence - and we'll strengthen that up, no doubt, because editorial independence is everything,” he said. 

Despite reassurances from Minister Jackson, other media experts are also ringing alarm bells. Media ethics specialist Dr Denis Muller, a fellow at the Centre for Advancing Journalism in Melbourne, told a recent ‘Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures’ workshop that the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media legislation did not adequately safeguard editorial freedom.

“There's no protection in the Charter - or anywhere else in the legislation that I could see - from retaliation ... if it reports in a way which displeases the government.”

“If there's going to be a change in New Zealand, it's an opportunity to shore up the independence of public broadcasting. The legislation as drafted weakens it, because the existing Charter at RNZ is actually much stronger,” Dr Muller said.

Colin Peacock, Mediawatch presenter, reported that plenty of people at the meeting shared Muller's concern about the entity's vulnerability to political influence. And among them was Dr Ellis, who told Mediawatch:

“An Autonomous Crown Entity, which is what is proposed, must have regard to government policy. There is a guarantee of editorial independence in the bill, but it is less than watertight. And there are many, many ways in which influence can be exerted.”

Dr Ellis is also concerned about the number of state agencies that have oversight of ANZPM. He says there are four - possibly six - who will have some kind of oversight and monitoring role, far more than ever before.

The new legislation is set to take effect from 1 March next year. It is set to cost $327m over three years - a substantial increase in funding for public media.

Let your views be known – have a say!

There are now only 5 days left to have a say on the bill - we have until 8 September 2022Visit the Parliament website to find out more and to make a submission on the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill

Talk with your friends and family about this and encourage them to also have their say.

To make a quick submission take 5 minutes to fill in the online submission form on the parliament site here: https://www.parliament.nz/en/ECommitteeSubmission/53SCED_SCF_BILL_125298/CreateSubmission

Suggested points to consider making:

  • Public media must be totally free from political interference.
  • An independent media, free of government influence, is vital to a well-functioning democracy.
  • The Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill does not adequately safeguard editorial freedom.
  • I oppose the establishment of Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media as an Autonomous Crown Entity. To do so would make the public media entity vulnerable to government control. Instead, I recommend that ANZPM be established as an Independent Crown Entity, thereby providing stronger protection from political interference.
  • I recommend that changes are made to the bill to protect public broadcasting from political interference.
  • Editorial independence must be the new Charter's foremost principle.
  • I recommend including in the new Charter the first principle of the current Radio New Zealand Charter, which says ‘As an independent public service broadcaster, the public radio company’s purpose is to serve the public interest.’
  • Likewise, the second principle: ‘Freedom of thought and expression are foundations of democratic society and the public radio company as a public service broadcaster plays an essential role in exercising these freedoms.’

 REFERENCES

MEDIA COVERAGE

RNZ: Pushback on public media legislation

RNZ: New state broadcasting entity passes first hurdle in Parliament

RNZ: More unanswered questions about public media plan

RNZ: RNZ-TVNZ merger: Time is tight to finalise a complex merger

NZ Herald: New public TV and radio entity gets $327m funding boost

RNZ: RNZ-TVNZ mega-entity named 'Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media' in draft legislation

Go back to the September 2022 newsletter


RELATED ARTICLES


The corruption of the mainstream media

Most mainstream news organisations are making hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars a year, off the new Public Interest Journalism Fund. The Public Interest Journalism Fund is a $55m government grant handed out to news media organisations by the Labour government, via NZ On Air.  Continue reading

Stuff’s ‘brave new era’ – goodbye to independence and objectivity

The backbone of any democracy is an independent, objective, and responsible media. But the Stuff media organisation is eschewing this value system to undertake a ‘reset’. This includes a new company charter with Te Tiriti o Waitangi embedded at its core. Continue reading