< December 2021 newsletter

Blatant grab for power over the Gulf – again!

Currently, the Hauraki Gulf Forum is considering recommendations put forward for what is explained in a report as ‘updating and strengthening the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act’. Several major changes are being proposed.

 These include:

  • changing from a Forum into an Authority with statutory powers and functions; and
  • changing the composition of the Forum to allow a full co-governance arrangement. Co-governance leadership is envisioned with equal membership between mana whenua and what are called ‘others’ on this new Authority. A degree of flexibility on appointments is suggested;
  • introducing a Statutory Vision for the Gulf which prevails over regional, and district plans and relevant central government decision making;
  • exchanging the term ‘tangata whenua’ (people of the land) for ‘mana whenua’ (customary authority exercised by an iwi or hapu) throughout the Act:
  • all regional parks, both those in the catchment areas and on the islands, to be managed by the new Authority.

This plan was revealed in a report which was listed on the agenda of the recent November meeting of the Hauraki Gulf Forum. It follows three previous reviews/reports presented to the Forum seeking similar outcomes:

  1. The Bradley Review (2015)
  2. The Beverley, Maloney, Payne Review (2016)
  3. The Ministerial Advisory Committee report (2020)

Several aspects of this report are alarming from a democratic point of view. While there is a strong argument for the Forum to have increased functions and powers, this power should not be vested in the undemocratic body as recommended in the proposed co-governance model. Currently elected local body representatives have the lion’s share of the seats at the Forum table. The fact that the Auckland Council's representation of seven members is listed in the report as a problem is revealing as to the intention of this proposal. (These seven represent by far the largest group of citizens - over 1.6 million).

Instituting the co-governance model discriminates against the democratic rights and interests of the rest of the community. As does the proposal to include regional parks, both those in the catchment and on the islands. That would mean that this proposed new co-governed Authority, with half the members unaccountable to the wider community, would gain control of the management of these parks - parks that belong to the whole community.

The report comes with the recommendation that the report is adopted, and seeks an agreement that it is presented to Ministers for their consideration. However, some members of the Forum expressed the view that they would like more time to consider this proposal and as a consequence, the item has been deferred until the February 2022 meeting of the Hauraki Gulf Forum.


Contact the council members on the Forum, and their Mayors, to demand the public be consulted on this matter prior to any decision regarding the proposed changes. Here is a list of the council members’ email addresses:

Co-chair Pippa Coom – [email protected]

Cr Christine Fletcher –  [email protected]

Cr John Watson - [email protected]

Cr Wayne Walker - [email protected]

Mayor Sandra Goudie –[email protected]

Cr Phillip Buckthought – [email protected]

Cr Denis Tegg  - [email protected]

Cr Donna Arnold - [email protected]

Cr Rob McGuire - [email protected]

Valmaine Toki – [email protected]

Scott Milne - [email protected]

Cath Handley - [email protected]


Power play underway over control of the Hauraki Gulf

Go back to the December 2021 newsletter