Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act

The Marine and Coastal Area Act has resulted in over 580 applications for the recognition of customary rights and customary marine title over 10 million hectares of our foreshore and seabed, out to 12 nautical miles (22 kilometres), including harbours, estuaries and river mouths, the airspace above and many of the minerals below.

Background

The Marine and Coastal Area Act was created to replace the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004.

In 2009 the National-led government, as part of a November 2008 confidence-and-supply agreement with the Māori Party, undertook a review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. In response to the review the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 was passed, repealing the 2004 act. The new law replaced Crown ownership of the foreshore and seabed with a ‘no ownership’ regime and provides for the recognition of the customary rights of iwi, hapū and whānau in the common marine and coastal area.

This has resulted in a massive number of claims for customary title to the foreshore and seabed. Contrary to assurances given by the government, the claims include not only remote areas of the coast, but every inch of the common marine and coastal area of New Zealand. Over 580 applications have been lodged for the recognition of customary rights and customary marine title over 10 million hectares of the foreshore and seabed out to 12 nautical miles (22 kilometres), including harbours, estuaries and river mouths, the airspace above and many of the minerals below.

WHAT KINDS OF CUSTOMARY RIGHTS CAN BE RECOGNISED UNDER THE ACT?

The Act recognises three levels of statutory rights and interests which can be held and exercised subject to the guarantees in s 27: Rights of navigation, s 28: Rights of fishing and s 29: Reclaimed land.

PROTECTED CUSTOMARY RIGHT

This is basically about use and activities. These rights can be granted for customary activities like collecting hāngi stones or launching waka in the common marine and coastal area (CMCA). Holders of Protected Customary Rights (PCR) do not need resource consent to carry out customary activities, and local authorities cannot grant resource consents for other activities that would have an adverse effect on that PCR. With respect to the CMCA this is defined as a right which has been exercised since 1840, continues to be exercised in accordance with tikanga, (whether in the same way, or a way which has evolved over time), and is not extinguished as a matter of law (s 53). Holders of protected customary rights can delegate or transfer such rights in accordance with tikanga, and derive commercial benefits from such rights, including selling gravel etc. They do not, however, have title over the land (s 56). There is a particular status for PCR holders within the RMA framework (s 57), including a veto power on most adverse activities (essentially save existing ones). 
An applicant group does not need to have an interest in land in or abutting the specified part of the CMCA in order to establish PCR, (s 51(3)).

CUSTOMARY MARINE TITLE. (SECTIONS 58-60)

Obviously the most important and extensive of the rights, is basically about some of the elements of ownership and exclusive possession (that is, the right to possess the area to the exclusion of all other people), but the rights are conditional. For example, the group cannot sell the area, i.e. it cannot be alienated, save in accordance with tikanga to other persons in the same iwi or hapū. Nor can members of the public be excluded (s 26), subject to any wāhi tapu conditions that have been included in a government agreement or High Court order recognising Māori customary rights under the Act (s 79).

Title can be recognised if the applicant group holds the specified area in accordance with tikanga, and has “exclusively used and occupied the coastal area from 1840 to the present day, without substantial interruption” (s 58) – or received it since 1840 in accordance with tikanga from a group which itself had exclusive use and occupation since 1840 (s 60). There is no requirement to hold abutting or contiguous land, but this may be taken into account when determining whether customary marine title (CMT) exists. If a group has CMT recognised over an area, their rights will include the following:

  • a Resource Management Act permission right which allows the group say yes or no to activities that need resource consents or permits in the area - in effect the right to veto any proposed development;
  • a conservation permission right which allows the group say yes or no to certain conservation activities in the area;
    the right to be notified and consulted when other groups apply for marine mammal watching permits in the area the right to be consulted about changes to Coastal Policy Statements (s 77);
  • a wāhi tapu protection right, which lets the group seek recognition of a wāhi tapu and restrict access to the area, thereby creating public no-go zones, (ss 78 and 79). Trespassers can be fined of up to $5,000, (s 81(2));
  • the ownership of all minerals which are found in the area, other than petroleum, gold, silver and uranium. For example, where CMT is vested in an iwi or hapū over an area with iron sand deposits, those deposits would belong to that iwi or hapū. The group is entitled to receive any royalties due to the Crown in respect of such minerals from the date on which an application for title is first lodged (s 84(3)(b)).

While the Act guarantees access to the coastline, without charge, for individuals, the Act does not prohibit CMT holders from charging groups or commercial users for access, (s 26(1)).

RIGHT TO CONSULT

The third right is for all affected iwi, hapū or whānau to participate in consultation processes in the CMCA. Affected iwi, hapū and whānau are those which exercise kaitiakitanga, which is defined as exercise of guardianship or stewardship by the tangata whenua of an area in accordance with tikanga (ss 48 to 52). The Director-General of Conservation must have particular regard to the views of such affected parties in making conservation decisions (s 51).

WHAT WAS THE PROCESS TO APPLY FOR RECOGNITION OF CUSTOMARY RIGHTS?

There were two pathways for iwi, hapū or whānau to have their customary interests recognised at law - either by direct engagement with the Crown, (s 95), or by applying to the High Court (s 100). Groups could apply through both pathways. The deadline for applications closed on 3 April 2017. 

It is estimated the over 580 competing claims will tie the courts up for decades, costing the country tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars in claimant funding, policy advice and legal fees.

To prove that it has customary marine title for a particular area that should be recognised, a Māori group must have “exclusively used and occupied it from 1840 to the present day without substantial interruption” (s 58).

Our courts depend on an adversarial process – they are poorly equipped to test claims and evidence when there is no adversary – so it is important that members of the public provide historical and contemporary evidence to prove areas under claim have been used by others. This evidence can be as simple as offering statements showing where and when they, too, had swum, fished, boated and walked the beach etc. without restriction, thereby proving that the claimants have not had exclusive use and occupation, and therefore the do not meet the legal test.

REGULAR UPDATES

New information will be published on this page as it comes to hand. Updates on developments will also be included in our regular newsletters.

Join our mailing list to receive regular updates


Latest updates for this campaign


  • Featured post

    Update On Claims Under The Marine And Coastal Area Act

    Case management conferences have now been scheduled for the priority cases and their overlapping claims. These will take place between 28th May and 27th June, in 10 locations throughout the country - from Whangarei to Dunedin. These hearings are only for claimants and their counsel.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    The Claims To Our Coast

    There are two pathways claimants to the marine and coastal area could choose to file applications for the recognition of customary interests, i.e. the High Court route and/or direct engagement with the Crown. The Attorney General is currently involved in the first stage of dealing with the claims filed in the High Court. In the meantime, we hear that the government has agreed to negotiate Te Whanau a Apanui’s marine and coast area claim and its historical claim in the one package. See Waatea news item here.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Countering the claims to our coasts

    We have been very busy publicising the issue by contacting as many people as possible to alert them to the 26 February deadline to register as an interested party in the claims, and advising how to go about doing so. Over December/January over 400 organisations were contacted. This was followed up by a Facebook campaign, which included a video with links to a landing page on our updated website. This was launched on Friday 9th February, running for just over two weeks, and resulted in 10,700 visits to our website. We also sent a link to the video and website to all those on our mailing list. Our members have also been busy informing friends, family and other contacts, drawing their attention to the video and webpage.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    New social campaign to spread the word

    On Friday we went live on Facebook with our video ‘A Tsunami of claims has hit the coast of New Zealand’.  We are asking people to consider standing up for the public interest by becoming involved in the claims process as interested parties, because it is likely that the less public opposition there is to a claim, the greater the chance it will succeed.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Marine and Coastal Area Act: Maps of application areas

    Below are the maps of the application areas. Click a map to enlarge.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Marine and Coastal Area Act: Encourage others to take action

    In addition to encouraging family, friends, and colleagues to take action, approach other potential interested parties, such as boating clubs, fishing groups, bach owners, community groups, and anyone else with close associations with the coast, suggesting they also file Notices of Appearance;
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Countering the claims to our coast

    Contrary to assurances given by the government of the day, the avalanche of claims made under the Marine and Coastal Area Act include not only remote areas of the coast, but every inch of the marine and coastal area of New Zealand. More than 580 claims have been registered for recognition of Customary Rights and for Customary Marine Title over 10 million hectares of foreshore and seabed out to 12 nautical miles (22 kilometres), all harbours and estuaries, the airspace above and many of the minerals below.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Marine and Coastal Area Act: How to oppose a claim made directly with the Crown

    Under Crown engagement, the general public will be able to object to or support any application as part of a public enquiry process seeking submissions. This process has not yet begun. The sequence and timing for determination of Crown engagement applications are being developed and information about this will be published on the Justice Department website in due course.
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Marine and Coastal Area Act: How to oppose a claim made to the High Court

    Please note, the deadline to oppose a claim has passed. There will be an opportunity at a later date to submit on the applications received by the crown. To oppose or support a claim, any interested party may appear and be heard on an application for a recognition order if that person has, by the due date, filed a ‘Notice of Appearance’. In due course the interested party will be called on to give evidence. (You can simply state what time periods you have had unrestricted use of that area, and for what purpose).
    Continue reading
  • Featured post

    Marine and Coastal Area Act: Andrew Little's Response

    We posed a few questions to Andrew Little and here are his responses.
    Continue reading